• Home
  • About
    • About PBD
    • What Are Geospatial Technologies?
    • Matteo Luccio’s Bio
    • Conferences
    • Our Name
  • Topics
    • 3D imaging
    • Aerial photography
    • Bathymetry
    • Building Information Modeling (BIM)
    • CAD
    • Energy
    • Cadaster
    • Environment
    • Geodesy
    • GIS
    • LiDAR
    • Mapping
    • Navigation
    • Open source software
    • Other
    • Photogrammetry
    • Precision agriculture
    • Radar
    • Remote sensing
    • Satellite imaging
    • Satellite navigation
    • Seismology
    • Sensors
    • Surveying
    • UAS
    • Tracking
  • Magazines
    • Apogeo Spatial
    • ArcNews
    • ArcWatch
    • CE News
    • Earth Imaging Journal
    • GEOInformatics
    • GeoWorld
    • GIM International
    • Heights
    • Informed Infrastruct.
    • Imaging Notes
    • Point of Beginning
    • Prof. Surveyor Mag.
    • Sensors & Systems
    • Septentrio Insights
    • The American Surveyor
    • xyHt
  • Formats
    • Feature articles
    • Short articles
    • Interviews
    • News items
    • Other
  • All
  • Clients
  • Tips
    • Gripes
    • Tips
  • Contact Us
 

Satellite Imagery’s Impact

Posted by: Matteo    Tags:      Posted date:  April 10, 2015  |  No comment



Unthreatened, aerial imaging/mapping companies embrace commercial satellite imagery’s increased resolution

Last June, the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) granted Digital Globe permission to sell imagery at the highest resolution available from its current satellite constellation. It also allowed the company to sell imagery at a ground sample distance (GSD) of up to .25 meters panchromatic and 1 meter multispectral beginning six months after its next satellite—WorldView-3, which has a resolution of .31 meters—became operational in August. At this increased resolution, can satellite imagery now support applications that previously required aerial imagery? In other words, is the former beginning to cut into the market for the latter? How are aerial imagery companies reacting?

According to five aerial imagery providers, the availability of higher resolution satellite imagery is actually good for them, because it complements their products rather than competes with them and it raises expectations throughout the market. This reaction is analogous to that of the geospatial industry ten years ago to the launch of Google Earth: the consensus then was that, rather than compete with more professional digital mapping products, the popular new application would stimulate demand for them.

I discussed these issues with Brian R. Raber, Vice President of Merrick & Company, an engineering, architecture, surveying, planning, and geospatial solutions firm; Charles Mondello, Chief Industry Strategist at EagleView Technologies, which specializes in GIS, measurement, analysis, 3D models, and aerial oblique image capture and has a fleet of more than 70 aircraft; J. Edward Kunz, Senior Project Manager at Keystone Aerial Surveys, Inc., which operates 19 aircraft, 13 metric film camera systems, four large format digital sensors, and one LiDAR system; Ken Scruggs, Founder and President of Midwest Aerial Photography, which specializes in aerial imagery and photography in support of photogrammetric mapping projects; and Steve Kasten, Vice President of Surveying and Photogrammetry at Surdex, which provides digital orthophotography, GIS basemapping, and LiDAR services.

Read more…



Want to say something?





  Cancel Reply


9 + five =

« Tracking Aircraft in Flight
Navigating Without Addresses »






 

Copyright (c) 2012 by Pale Blue Dot, LLC / For information write to matteo@palebluedotllc.com